Skip to comments.
Why Ukraine's Pro-Western Coalition Split (Tymoshenko Allying with Putin)
Time ^
| 09/04/08
| Time
Posted on 09/05/2008 6:25:32 PM PDT by GOPGuide
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
09/05/2008 6:25:32 PM PDT
by
GOPGuide
To: GOPGuide
russians are only 17% of the ukraine.
2
posted on
09/05/2008 6:29:25 PM PDT
by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
To: GOPGuide
Informed sources in both Moscow and Kiev have told TIME that Tymoshenko has reached a deal with the Kremlin, under which she would be more considerate of Russia's needs particularly for long-term rights to its Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol and would tone down her traditional anti-Moscow diatribes, and in return she may find Russia more flexible when it comes to negotiating next year's prices for the natural gas on which Ukraine depends. However, Tymoshenko firmly denies rumors of any accommodation with foreign powers, insisting that she abides only by the interests of Ukraine....I don't blame her; after all, what assurance does she have that the U.S. can come to her aid when Russia has a man in our WH "that has looked into Putin's soul and saw man I can trust!"...she might, however want to stall a bit until after Nov. 4, because John McCain looked into the same man's eyes and "SAW K-G-B!"
3
posted on
09/05/2008 6:30:03 PM PDT
by
meandog
(please pray for future President McCain, day minus 142-Jan. 20--and counting)))
To: GOPGuide
..I hope Yulia Tymoshenko puts Ukraine’s interests ahead of her own political ambitions—I suspect otherwise—so does Yuschenko...
4
posted on
09/05/2008 6:39:14 PM PDT
by
WalterSkinner
( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
To: meandog
President Bush has acted honorably in regard to Russia.
I disagree with your assessment that we would not support Ukraine. Cheney is there contradicting your precise point.
5
posted on
09/05/2008 6:40:17 PM PDT
by
lonestar67
(Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
To: GOPGuide

Tymoshenko has at least one thing in common with a well known American politician.
To: ken21
"russians are only 17% of the ukraine"
And, what, 50-60% of the Crimea?
Plus, the 300-year history of Sevastapol as the Black Sea port of the Russian Navy.
Please, don't dismiss the danger of any potential US interference (Cheney) is Ukrainian-Russian affairs.
Russia could EASILY take the Crimea...have people dancing in the streets...and have us with SEVERE credibility problems throughout the world.
IF we tried to resist Russian intervention in a real way, we'd find ourselves in a nuclear war.
7
posted on
09/05/2008 7:19:30 PM PDT
by
Mariner
To: Mariner
that is true.
and the crimea was always a winter vacation spa for the government elite.
8
posted on
09/05/2008 7:20:57 PM PDT
by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
To: GOPGuide
There may be a new synonym for quisling.
9
posted on
09/05/2008 7:21:26 PM PDT
by
Defiant
("There is only one man in this election who has ever really fought for you". Thus spoke Sarahthustra)
To: wideminded
she has that viking look!
the vikings used to run their ships down the volga.
10
posted on
09/05/2008 7:26:28 PM PDT
by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
To: ken21
she has that viking look! the vikings used to run their ships down the volga. Her look is appeasement.
To: Mariner
Please, don't dismiss the danger of any potential US interference (Cheney) is Ukrainian-Russian affairs. The U.S. and Ukraine can deal as they please. Your post suggests that Ukraine and the U.S. should appease Russia.
To: FreeReign
cheney has softened his tone towards russia lately.
13
posted on
09/05/2008 7:48:27 PM PDT
by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
To: GOPGuide
Putin has found another crooked oligarch to get behind. Putin and the gas princess are a perfect match!
To: ken21
cheney has softened his tone towards russia lately.For example, what?
To: FreeReign
critics claimed that cheney’s remarks would further escalate tensions between russia and the u.s.
the response from the white house concerning cheney’s remarks was to deny that he was making russia an enemy.
16
posted on
09/05/2008 8:07:49 PM PDT
by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
To: FreeReign
also, from today’s wsj the headline:
cheney assures georgia of u.s. support but curbs hawkish tone.
17
posted on
09/05/2008 8:10:05 PM PDT
by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
To: ken21
also, from todays wsj the headline: cheney assures georgia of u.s. support but curbs hawkish tone. Here's the Wall St. Journal headline that I found today.
Sep 5 | WSJ: Cheney Visits Georgia, Slams Russian Actions
Looks like the same Cheney policy to me. How is that Cheney "softening his tone"?
To: FreeReign
i’m looking at the wsj, p. a 8:
“cheney assures georgia of u.s. support but curbs hawkish tone”,
which supports my original reply to you.
19
posted on
09/05/2008 8:40:28 PM PDT
by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
To: FreeReign
My post suggest the US should mind it’s own business and pursue only it’s real strategic interests.
20
posted on
09/05/2008 9:23:42 PM PDT
by
Mariner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson