...[Obama said] true success in Iraq -- victory in Iraq -- will not take place in a surrender ceremony where an enemy lays down their arms. . . I want Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future, and to reach the political accommodation ...That's victory. That's success. ... and that's why I will end this war as President.
Hmm.
As I read this, Marxist Obama says, explicitly, that a military victory is not a victory; however that a "political accommodation" IS a victory.
"Political accommodation?" Yes, Marxist Obama would use his vast community organizer experience have the U.S. military leave in non-victory (aka defeat), and HOPE that the bad guys submit to conflict resolution.
(Nervous laughter.)
.
“victory in Iraq — will not take place in a surrender ceremony where an enemy lays down their arms.”
That’s all I need to know. Obama wants one of those “Peace with Honor” type arrangements that Nixon did (pretty much had to do with all of the protests back home), but like the Dems back then, walk away from their support to Vietnam/Iraq and have it all collapse.