Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strongest Storms Grow Stronger Yet, Study Says
New York Times ^ | September 3, 2008 | KENNETH CHANG

Posted on 09/04/2008 3:40:59 AM PDT by palmer

A new study finds that the strongest of hurricanes and typhoons have become even stronger over the last two and a half decades, adding grist to the contentious debate over whether global warming has already made storms more destructive.

I think we do see a climate signal here, said James B. Elsner, a professor of geography at Florida State University who is the lead author of the paper, being published in Thursdays issue of the journal Nature.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS: climatechange; environment; globalony; globalwarming; gorebalony; propagandawingofdnc
The key phrase is "over the last two and a half decades". As you read further in the article, Chris Landsea points out that the conclusions might have been skewed because the starting point of the data, 1981, coincided with a relatively quiet period of Atlantic hurricane activity, whereas the ending point, 2006, coincided with an active period that began around 1995.

My local radio station played this news story today as tropical blob Hannah "threatens" us with much needed rain and Ike does what many hurricanes do, peak at 4/5 in the middle of nowhere and weaken as they approach land. Naturally they didn't have time to mention the short span of the study and other flaws.

1 posted on 09/04/2008 3:41:00 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: palmer

bookmark


2 posted on 09/04/2008 3:42:52 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Since all the polar ice didn’t melt this year, they have to get on another story.


3 posted on 09/04/2008 3:51:07 AM PDT by Aussiebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Ho-hum. NYT says the sky is falling, yet again. Just like global warming in the 20s, cooling in the 70s, and back to more global whining now.

Moving right along.


4 posted on 09/04/2008 3:54:43 AM PDT by BobbyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussiebabe
You are right, all the ice was supposed to melt because it was thin, one year ice. But some thin, one year ice is still there since there is more ice this year than the same time last year. But that isn't stopping them from trying, for example, 19-square-mile ice sheet breaks loose in Canada

TORONTO (AP) - A chunk of ice shelf nearly the size of Manhattan has broken away from Ellesmere Island in Canada's northern Arctic, another dramatic indication of how warmer temperatures are changing the polar frontier, scientists said Wednesday

5 posted on 09/04/2008 3:59:15 AM PDT by palmer (The third party malcontents don't like Palin because she is a true conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Trust the GlobalWarming tax-grab crowd to cling to dying concepts. I assume you’ve seen this, one of hundreds that come to similar conclusions:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/certifigate/index?tab=articles


6 posted on 09/04/2008 4:03:17 AM PDT by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...


FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

The Great Global Warming Swindle Video

Not Evil Just Wrong (mash here)
yeah.. right.


7 posted on 09/04/2008 4:06:02 AM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CanaGuy

Hey, CanaGuy, fyi....here’s the correct url!

http://www.spaceandscience.net/id16.html


8 posted on 09/04/2008 4:06:17 AM PDT by CanaGuy (Go Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CanaGuy
Yeah, I've read that stuff before. Much more hype than facts. If you want a balanced discussion of the climate threat from solar changes, go to climateaudit.org and look for the Svalgaard threads. I think this is the latest one: Svalgaard #8 where Steve M (one of the greatest AGW skeptics in the world today) says

Solar topics seem to draw out personal theories and Leif has been very indulgent in discussing such theories - far more indulgent than I would be. However, please limit your discussion to published literature rather than your own bright new ideas.

That advice applies in spades to the Casey guy in the link you provided and many here who promulgate their pet solar theories without any scientific scrutiny.

9 posted on 09/04/2008 4:21:55 AM PDT by palmer (The third party malcontents don't like Palin because she is a true conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: palmer

And just a few months ago we had articles saying hurricanes weren’t affected by global warming. Wish the experts could make up their minds. It’s tough out here trying to figure out what I should be terrified of. /s/


10 posted on 09/04/2008 4:36:32 AM PDT by saganite (Obama is a political STD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

I guess the Times wants to forget the fact this past calendar year has been one of the coldest on record.


11 posted on 09/04/2008 4:40:14 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer; CanaGuy

I agree with Palmer. This is a guy with little more than a computer and a DSL line who tries to present himself as head of some research institution. Even when he’s right, he’s not credible and serves to help the like of Hansen and his minion, Gavin, and the rest of enviromarxists, not to mention the scientists who once sought the truth and understanding, but now seek grant money with all of the vigor of T Boone when he’s got a plan to Pickens the taxpayers’ pockets.


12 posted on 09/04/2008 4:41:18 AM PDT by Entrepreneur (The environmental movement is filled with watermelons - green on the outside, red on the inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: palmer

This after a three year period in which no significant storm hit the US despite the dire warnings that hurricanes would become more frequent and more deadly. But, lets skip over that bit of data.


13 posted on 09/04/2008 5:19:35 AM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

The left is simply delusional.


14 posted on 09/04/2008 5:34:35 AM PDT by mike-zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Hannah "threatens" us with much needed rain and Ike does what many hurricanes do, peak at 4/5 in the middle of nowhere and weaken as they approach land.

Also, satellite and computer technology allows us to see storms and estimate strength, that was never done before a couple of decades ago.

15 posted on 09/04/2008 6:53:33 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer; calcowgirl; The Spirit Of Allegiance; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; ...


Beam me to Planet Gore !

16 posted on 09/04/2008 11:53:50 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson