It should be a clue that the points and evidence supporting Creationism stand individually, independently, simply and concisely, while the so-called "evidence" supporting evolution is hopelessly complicated and intertwined in circular reasoning, no doubt in an attempt to distract people from the fact that 'the Emperor has no clothes'.
The Lord is not the author of confusion. (1 Cor 14:33) If only 'scientists' would rely on the infallible Word in lieu of their own 'wisdom', it would save them the embarrassment they are experiencing now.
That is a creationist talking point, and an outright lie. You should be ashamed to lie so blatantly.
...the so-called "evidence" supporting evolution is hopelessly complicated and intertwined in circular reasoning, no doubt in an attempt to distract people from the fact that 'the Emperor has no clothes'.
Another creationist talking point. And another lie.
If only 'scientists' would rely on the infallible Word in lieu of their own 'wisdom', it would save them the embarrassment they are experiencing now.
They would not then be doing science, but religious apologetics. Much as you are doing.
Remember, this was tried. They called it the Dark Ages.