Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
Great reiteration of the fallacy of denying the antecedent.

We've been over this. The question was explicitly asked and explicitly answered. It's your antecedent, and now you're the one trying to deny it. One more time, put the goal post down and leave it there, and quit trying to blame me for the holes in your argument.

137 posted on 10/02/2008 2:19:21 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
"We've been over this."

That's OK. We can go over it again if we need to.

"The question was explicitly asked and explicitly answered. It's your antecedent, and now you're the one trying to deny it."

You are the one using fallacious statements to deny the antecedent in hopes of falsifying the consequent. That is the fallacy of denying the antecedent.

"One more time, put the goal post down and leave it there, and quit trying to blame me for the holes in your argument."

One more time, not until you agree to stop moving them and stop using logical fallacies as arguments for non-existent 'holes'.

138 posted on 10/03/2008 3:52:34 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson