All you have to do is find one that doesn't and he's proven wrong. There are plenty of examples to be found.
ID is rejected because it's inconsistent with methodological naturalism and the scientific method.
In order for science to operate the way you think it should it will have to abandon methodological naturalism and the scinetific method, and accept supernatural explanations as valid scientific theory - in all disciplines. The arguments that hurricae Katrina was caused by God's punishment of New Orleans because there were too many fags and fornicators will be elevated to valid scientific theory.
Yeah, IDer's who aren't considered to be scientists.
"ID is rejected because it's inconsistent with methodological naturalism and the scientific method."
So is an 'a priori' commitment to philosophical naturalism but that doesn't seem to stop 'science'.
"In order for science to operate the way you think it should it will have to abandon methodological naturalism and the scinetific method, and accept supernatural explanations as valid scientific theory - in all disciplines. The arguments that hurricae Katrina was caused by God's punishment of New Orleans because there were too many fags and fornicators will be elevated to valid scientific theory."
No, that's the fallacy of appeal to consequences of a belief.