To: GourmetDan
Nope. He can be wrong and ID still not be science. Heck, ID doesn’t even have to be supernatural according to the proponents, so that’s not even a good test to start with.
111 posted on
09/18/2008 6:24:30 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
"Nope. He can be wrong and ID still not be science. Heck, ID doesn’t even have to be supernatural according to the proponents, so that’s not even a good test to start with." Nope. That's what ID is. Letting the evidence guide you to another theory of origins other than philosophical naturalism. That ID is so viciously attacked is proof that Lewontin's statement is absolutely correct. To admit an intelligent-designer would be the proverbial 'Divine Foot' in the door.
112 posted on
09/19/2008 6:07:05 AM PDT by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson