Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Callahan
Choosing Mitt or Pawlenty would have generated zero buzz.

I'm a minority here, but I think zero buzz would have been the smarter move. The election should be a referendum on Barack Obama. That's the only way we can win this. If it becomes a referendum on John McCain or George Bush or anything else (aside from maybe Osama bin Laden), we lose.

That's what the poll numbers suggest. There's a reason we lost Congress in '06 -- GOP branding is in the toilet. The question the public needs to ask is -- what's the alternative? This year, the alternative is an untested Chicago radical -- far too extreme for the country.

89 posted on 09/03/2008 2:04:48 PM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Alter Kaker
The election should be a referendum on Barack Obama.

And that would give the game away, by making it Barack's to lose. The MSM would quickly play down and cover up any gaffe BHO made. And BHO could play kill-the-clock and win.

Only by getting the buzz away from Barack does McCain force BHO to get off from the same old boring stuff. And then the chance for a big gaffe gets stronger.

This is a referendum on how the two Pres candidates make decisions. And McCains VP decision is getting the buzz. He wins this round.

234 posted on 09/03/2008 4:11:40 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard work to be cynical enough in this age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson