Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: airborne
Not really. She's attacking Palin for the disclosure when the real culprit is the media.

And Palin does not need to be the focus of the Convention coverage until she is formally nominated.

Where is the coverage of the GOP and McCain in all this?

And when will the media vet Obama?

31 posted on 09/02/2008 1:47:04 PM PDT by weegee ("We now know far more about Sarah Palin in just 4days than we've learned about B.Obama in 17 months")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
Like I sad, "kind of".

"...but I would much prefer to hear more about what she can do for our country rather than how her daughter is going to have a child no matter what."

"I think that parents need to recognize how important it is to talk to their children about the things that can result from being sexually active if they aren't protecting themselves."

That's more than I've heard from Alan Colmes and his lib buddies.

32 posted on 09/02/2008 1:51:21 PM PDT by airborne (Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson