Replies

I’ve already pointed out several points on which you’re wrong, i.e., your saying that the “injunction” was denied, and that Berg hasn’t addressed damages, etc.

You accuse me of being unreasonably obstinate, but despite my showing where you’ve been wrong on several points, you’re the one who won’t be persuaded by reason.

All I admitted to was not being a lawyer, not that I “know nothing about” of what I write. And I maintain that I know more about these matters than you do. You won’t even answer simple questions, like whether or not you read the complaint, whether or not you have legal training, etc.

And if Berg’s suit IS thrown out, does that by necessity mean that Berg has no standing, or will it be the first time in history that a liberal Democrat judge and/or corrupt court ever tossed a suit for political reasons?

I’ve already pointed out several points on which you’re wrong, i.e., your saying that the “injunction” was denied, and that Berg hasn’t addressed damages, etc.

Restraining Order - An order in the nature of an injunction which may issue upon filing of an application for an injunction forbidding the defendant from doing the threatened act until a hearing on the application can be had.

And if Berg’s suit IS thrown out, does that by necessity mean that Berg has no standing, or will it be the first time in history that a liberal Democrat judge and/or corrupt court ever tossed a suit for political reasons?

See? Your mind is made up already. Berg is right, and if it get's thrown out then it's due to a corrupt system rather than an headline-chasing attorney with a bogus case. And there is nothing that I or anyone else could ever do to convince you otherwise. So by all means follow these two suits. Hell, file one of your own. Be sure and let me know how if comes out.

I’ve already pointed out several points on which you’re wrong, i.e., your saying that the “injunction” was denied, and that Berg hasn’t addressed damages, etc.

Restraining Order - An order in the nature of an injunction which may issue upon filing of an application for an injunction forbidding the defendant from doing the threatened act until a hearing on the application can be had.

And if Berg’s suit IS thrown out, does that by necessity mean that Berg has no standing, or will it be the first time in history that a liberal Democrat judge and/or corrupt court ever tossed a suit for political reasons?

See? Your mind is made up already. Berg is right, and if it get's thrown out then it's due to a corrupt system rather than an headline-chasing attorney with a bogus case. And there is nothing that I or anyone else could ever do to convince you otherwise. So by all means follow these two suits. Hell, file one of your own. Be sure and let me know how if comes out.