Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

The judge has not “denied the injunction”, because that is what the entire suit is about—obtaining an injunction against Obama’s candidacy. The judge HAS denied a temporary restraining order.

Berg’s specific standing relates to his being a member of the Democrat party, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton. Did you even read his complaint? I suspect not. He does, in fact, mention specific damages in the complaint, which I pointed out earlier. You seem to have trouble tracking and/or processing facts.

Unless you try to convince me that you’re a lawyer(or otherwise qualified to pontificate as you have), I’ll just ignore your impertinence.


83 posted on 09/04/2008 6:10:54 AM PDT by VigilantAmerican (We will not waver, we will not tire; we will not falter, we will not fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: VigilantAmerican
Unless you try to convince me that you’re a lawyer(or otherwise qualified to pontificate as you have), I’ll just ignore your impertinence.

If our discussion has shown me anything it's that I'm not likely to change your mind on any subject at all, much less one you admit to knowing nothing about. I'll just sit back and let the legal system do it's work on both Berg and Robinson's frivilous suits. You be sure and ping me and let me know how mad you are that a likely Democratic judge and a corrupt court screwed Berg when they toss out his case.

84 posted on 09/04/2008 6:24:52 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson