[FocusNexus]

“At first blush, here’s what we know about the relative experience of the two candidates. Both are in their mid-forties and have held statewide elective office for less than four years. Both have admitted to taking illegal drugs in their youth.”

Equating Obama’s drug use and Palin having tried marijuana, but she didn’t like it IS a bias FOR Obama. Also, Obama being in the Senate as one of 100 is NOT the same as Palin having been governor.

[hole_n_one]

You are so far off base that my 80 year old mom could pick you off, and she wouldn't even have to use her best move.

Read the piece again, this time with your eyes open.

[beezdotcom]

Equating Obama’s drug use and Palin having tried marijuana, but she didn’t like it IS a bias FOR Obama. Also, Obama being in the Senate as one of 100 is NOT the same as Palin having been governor.

You seem a little IRONY deficient. The comparison of drug use mocks Obama, because everyone is already aware that her drugs were legal, his were not. The "one of 100" comment mocks Obama. The writer of this article is so 'in the tank' for Palin, it's almost embarrassing (but refreshing).

Seriously, if you can't see the sarcasm dripping from every point this writer penned, it is NOT the writer's fault. In every bullet, the writer makes it obvious that he views Palin's experience as superior to Obama's. So much so that the left-wing blogosphere is FURIOUS with the author.

[RightWingConspirator]

Wouldn't Obama say that he's 1 in 100, but Palin is only 1 in 57?

:-)