Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pa mom
It just seems that there is a bias AGAINST adoption, that it is somehow a lesser option.

I am not biased AGAINST adoption, but, unlike you, I am not biased FOR adoption, either.

I personally know more than one adoptive home that did NOT escape divorce. Adoption does not equal utopia...unfortunately.

2,935 posted on 09/02/2008 12:11:32 PM PDT by top 2 toe red ("Cackling hillary...makes her sound like she is mentally-illary." Jimmy Kimmel. "Uh...she is!" Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2928 | View Replies ]


To: top 2 toe red

We can all point to personal experiences that prove or disprove any generality, so that is not usually a strong rhetorical tool.

I am absolutely pro-adoption, and I help place babies in great homes all the time. The couples giving up these children are not without resources, financial and social, and they love their babies. I see it in their eyes when they turn over the child. Their hearts break—But they want to give their child a more certain future.

Some of the “she’ll be surrounded by a loving family” sounds suspiciously like “it takes a village”. Ultimately, child-rearing is the responsibility of one man and one woman creating a nuclear family.


2,936 posted on 09/02/2008 12:18:22 PM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2935 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson