Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

VERY unlikely. 1. the pro abortion candidate would have had the child abort the baby quietly and quickly. 2. you would never ever hear about it.


2,008 posted on 09/01/2008 3:23:49 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

and you forget if we did hear about the aborted child it would be considered and invasion of privacy and her right to have chosen to kill that child since obviously ( I type this part with continued disgust ) all us women want that right because how dare we not take the bigger step in having a child that might not have initially been planned.

I still say this is up to Sarah and daughter to handle this with some incredible power that makes sure the momentum stays with Sarah. Avoiding any other public comment about this I think will be costly and allows the MSM to freely skate around it with “suggestion”

Addressing it for what it is with no shame but a mother who wants to protect her daughters character in the event she is bashed vs a daughter who has no shame over this and takes full responsibility for her actions which includes raising the child looks incredible. It’s all in the presentation. Leave it hanging out there and all kinds of things will happen. Present it properly and you come out looking like a hero.


2,019 posted on 09/01/2008 3:30:32 PM PDT by cosmic_me (Stop picking your nose. People are watching.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2008 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson