Your attempt to link Sarah Palin's daughters pregnancy with the situation involving what Ronald and Nancy Reagan went through, is pathetic. IMO, there is no linkage, whatsoever. One thing is true. Both situations contained matters related to poor judgment by all parties concerned.
>>>>>I am beginning to think that this is less about Bristol's unfortunate pregnancy and more about a bunch of disaffected Ronpaulians, Romneyites, and Obamanics hurting the McCain campaign.
I'm beginning to think you're making ALL this up as you go along.
Again, I will be voting for McCain in November.
They're very comparable. Both involve conception out of wedlock.
Bravo, Reagan Man.
OK, let's find out!
In 1952 Nancy Davis wasn't 17 years old
I never wrote that she was. In fact, I pointed out that her unwed pregnancy was worse because her and Ronald Reagan's fornication was committed as adults without youth as a mitigating factor. You complained in your post #1614 about Bristol having an "unwed teen pregnancy". Was it only the "teen" that bothers you? There was nothing "over the top, out of line and wrong" in that statement or this one.
and Ronald Reagan wasn't the GOP nominee for VPOTUS.
Now, he was later the GOP nominee for POTUS. Did you hold his previous lack of judgment against him then as much as you are holding Bristol Palin's lack of judgment against SARAH Palin now? If not, why not? There was nothing "over the top, out of line and wrong" in that question or this one.
Your remarks are fictitious.
That statement itself is certainly a lie. Which of my remarks do you consider fictitious? Please quote them.
Your attempt to link Sarah Palin's daughters pregnancy with the situation involving what Ronald and Nancy Reagan went through, is pathetic.
I was accurately pointing out the clear hypocrisy of someone with your screen name condemning someone for her daughter's sins and not Ronald Reagan for his own analogous sins. There was nothing "over the top, out of line and wrong" in that statement or this one.
IMO, there is no linkage, whatsoever.
Yes, that deliberate oversight is what makes you a hypocrite!
One thing is true. Both situations contained matters related to poor judgment by all parties concerned.
Yet you only seem willing to condemn someone for their daughter's poor judgment and not their own. I really am beginning to think that this is less about Bristol's unfortunate pregnancy and more about a bunch of disaffected Ronpaulians, Romneyites, and Obamanics hurting the McCain campaign.
I'm beginning to think you're making ALL this up as you go along.
What exactly do you think I am "making up"? Your hypocrisy in this matter is clear for all to see.
Again, I will be voting for McCain in November.
Sure you will! Your blatant attempts to publicly call his judgment into question and attack his running mate for her daughter's sins coupled with your alleged voting preference is laughable. There was nothing "over the top, out of line and wrong" in anything I have written here. You need to go back to troll school!