Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: PALIN ADMITS HER 17-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER IS PREGNANT.
The New York Post ^ | 9-1-08

Posted on 09/01/2008 9:05:11 AM PDT by WackySam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,941-1,9601,961-1,9801,981-2,000 ... 3,041-3,051 next last
To: frankjr

RE: “So you are now saying John did “bad stuff” with Price Charles? The news just keeps getting worse and worse”

OH, thanks for the laughs — your post had me laughing so hard I woke up the dog!


1,961 posted on 09/01/2008 2:49:20 PM PDT by CaliforniaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I am overwhelmed and humbled that many have found that post helpful.


1,962 posted on 09/01/2008 2:49:22 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper (Let's Roll!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1955 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

They can’t prevent her from making a life-altering mistake, but they *can* put their daughters on birth control, like most responsible parents.

Sorry to say this folks, but not putting a 16-year-old girl on birth control is monumentally stupid, whether you preach abstinence or not.


1,963 posted on 09/01/2008 2:49:28 PM PDT by TINS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
"The earth, and especially the U.S., is overpopulated as it is."

Really? OK tell me, if we were to take ALL the people in the world (around 5 Billion) and stood them in a group giving each perosn about 1 square yard. How many States of the UNite States of America would they cover?

1,964 posted on 09/01/2008 2:50:04 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 966 | View Replies]

To: webrover
I've tried to be respectful to you.

The record will speak for itself.

1,965 posted on 09/01/2008 2:50:19 PM PDT by Petronski (The Vice Presidency is below Sarah Palin's paygrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1956 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle
What part of “lurker” don't you understand? Did you red my original post that set these folks off? Anyone who got spooked by that post is nuts.
1,966 posted on 09/01/2008 2:50:23 PM PDT by webrover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

LURKER. Meaning someone who hangs out here without posting. There are probably thousands lurking here.


1,967 posted on 09/01/2008 2:50:31 PM PDT by Just Lori (Life is fragile. Handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1952 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
I didn’t post what you quoted me as saying.

You are correct, my appoligies... I misquoted you 100%... my answer was to your post, but somehow I got the wrong quote.

1,968 posted on 09/01/2008 2:51:36 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1924 | View Replies]

To: TINS
Sorry to say this folks, but not putting a 16-year-old girl on birth control is monumentally stupid, whether you preach abstinence or not.

Well, I'm sure there's many folks on this forum who do not appreciate having their actions being called stupid.

Perhaps you might be more respectful of differing opinions.

1,969 posted on 09/01/2008 2:51:42 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1963 | View Replies]

To: petitfour
There is another thread of a Time article that says that Palin is not an abstinence-only preacher. But maybe you have better information.

Sarah Palin from a 2006 Eagle Forum Alaska questionnaire:

Q: Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?

Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.

1,970 posted on 09/01/2008 2:52:48 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1761 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20

Indeed you are correct. And calling a human being, created by God, something evil is a perfect example of that.

1,971 posted on 09/01/2008 2:53:34 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper (Let's Roll!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1943 | View Replies]

To: TINS
Disagree. In addition, perhaps birth control was involved and failed which does happen. That being said, the how and why is way over “the publics right to know” line.
1,972 posted on 09/01/2008 2:53:43 PM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1963 | View Replies]

To: TINS

So, your not upset that she had teenage sex but you are upset that she got pregnant. Their is nothing immoral about getting pregnant or not being on birth control. It was immoral for her to have premarital sex, however, she is acting responsibly, keeping the kid and getting married. So, we should be encouraging her rather than attacking her. Frankly, I don’t see how you can be mad at her or her mother over the birth control issue since birth control is simply not a moral issue.


1,973 posted on 09/01/2008 2:54:17 PM PDT by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1963 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Really? OK tell me, if we were to take ALL the people in the world (around 5 Billion) and stood them in a group giving each perosn about 1 square yard. How many States of the UNite States of America would they cover?

I was talking about this the other day with someone. Assuming 6 billion people on the planet, if you give each person (not each family) 1,250 square feet of space, everyone would fit inside the state of Texas.
1,974 posted on 09/01/2008 2:55:00 PM PDT by TexasAg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1964 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Yes it will. You are incapable of a coherent response. If you have a problem with my original post you are not quite sentient. I don’t care how long FR has tolerated you.


1,975 posted on 09/01/2008 2:55:00 PM PDT by webrover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1965 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.

Indeed that is the only morally acceptable approach.

1,976 posted on 09/01/2008 2:55:06 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper (Let's Roll!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1970 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Tell me again how two teenagers with less than a high school education are going to support a baby without our tax dollars?

If my mother were still alive, I'd give you her phone number and you could call and ask her the same question. Only leave out the dad part and welfare, both were non-existant in the '50s...............as were jobs in northern Michigan.

1,977 posted on 09/01/2008 2:55:15 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: jabchae

OMG are you insane? I hope this isnt your view. What kind of deranged person would give a baby up for adoption when the baby is loved and wanted and has the support of a mother, father and grandparents?


1,978 posted on 09/01/2008 2:56:14 PM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3 (new poster, not enough time to think up a clever tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Best compliment you’ve ever received, so cherish it. ;o)


1,979 posted on 09/01/2008 2:56:26 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 838 | View Replies]

To: webrover

I never claimed a problem with your original post, n00b. I don’t care about your original post.


1,980 posted on 09/01/2008 2:56:52 PM PDT by Petronski (The Vice Presidency is below Sarah Palin's paygrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1975 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,941-1,9601,961-1,9801,981-2,000 ... 3,041-3,051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson