What are you talking about?
Why would you wish that a good man has no chance at all to be President?
I wouldn't. Oh, you mean Mitt Romney. That's simple: he's not a good man. He's a liar and a charlatan who will say anything to get elected.
Oh I remember why he shouldn’t have any chance, because he made a mistake in the past and we can’t look past anyone’s mistakes.
A mistake? He made a lifetime's worth of mistakes. He's the offspring of two liberal Republicans who ran as a liberal Republican, governed as a liberal Republican and then expected us to believe the laughable story that he had decided to become a conservative just in time to run for President.
No one can ever change, we are all perfect. Right, I wonder how many people are taking your advice today?
Yeah, I can see you Mittwits just itching to use the Palin pregnancy as an excuse to start bashing her and advocating for your liberal again. When you start again (and you will), we'll all be here to smack you back down again.
I know the media is trying to make a big case for that position today. Do you feel at least a little guilty for calling people names?
I don't feel the least bit guilty about smacking down liberalism on a conservative forum. You people expect to come here pimping your liberal without being questioned. Well, too bad.
You need to grow up
You first. Liberalism is a child's ideology. Stop advocating for it on this forum in the form of a greasy MA politician.
Listen lady, am I bashing Palin? No. Just trying to point out some inconsistencies by people like you. By the way, Fred isn’t VP either, so get over it. Stop calling names. You obviously feel complete freedom to call names. By contrast, I have to be careful what I say to you. I don’t understand how you feel comfortable getting away with it. I have to be careful when pointing out that you are being hypocritical. It’s not about attacking Palin, it’s about holding you accountable and you know it.