It’s not as simple as calling it a tax, or a windfall tax as O’Bama has called it. It’s a comprehensive bill, that has resulted in a win-win.
Here’s the actual deal...
Legislation that generates billions of dollars in additional oil and gas revenue for future generations of Alaskans passed the Alaska Senate this evening. HB 3001 replaces the state’s outdated ELF system with a thoroughly modern oil tax plan that raises significantly more revenue and can help to refill the trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline by encouraging the industry to explore for new oil deposits.
Sen. Ralph Seekins (R - Fairbanks) chairs the Senate Special Committee on Natural Gas Development, the committee responsible for the landmark legislation.
“This legislation hits all the bases. It modernizes the state’s petroleum tax structure and spurs the industry to go out and drill for more oil by granting tax credits for verifiable expenditures made in Alaska. This bill also captures our fair share of record high oil prices so Alaska has the revenue it needs for many years to come,” Said Sen. Seekins.
“There is far more to this piece of legislation than just raising more oil revenue because it eventually creates new, good paying jobs in many different sectors of the economy,” said Senate President Ben Stevens.
Here are some highlights of bill:
* 20% production tax credits for oil and gas investment in Alaska
* 22.5% tax rate on “net” positive cash flow or “Production Tax Value”
* Progressivity. A higher tax rate (.25) kicks in when oil sells for more than $55 per barrel.
* At today’s ANS closing price of $75.05 and a full year of production the PPT will generate 3.7 billion in one year revenues, almost three times the amount generated under the current ELF based production tax.
* Protects declining Cook Inlet oil production by leaving the existing tax structure in place.
* Requires a report in 2011 about how well all the incentive provisions are working to enhance exploration, development and production in the state.
Very informative. I don’t see what was done as the imposition of a windfall profits tas. If any coastal state in the lower 48 would open up offshore drilling, that state would get a cut of eventual production, just like Alaska.
THANK YOU for the clarification and enlightenment on that!! Facts are still on our side. :-)
I realize that this bill is popular in Alaska. The bill is nothing more than voting yourself someone else's property. If the residents of Alaska want to own mineral rights, they should purchase them.
The US government should auction mineral rights instead of this terrible leasing arrangement. The wireless spectrum has been auctioned creating property rights. The mineral rights in federal areas should be auctioned also.
Exactly what happens to the private owners of leases?