Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: businessprofessor

I’ve never heard the democrats claim that, and if they did, they’re wrong because the US Constitution provides no such provision. I’ve only heard the democrats blather on about “punishing” the oil companies for making profit. Alaska is essentially run from oil money, that’s why there’s no income tax. Washington doesn’t depend on oil like Alaska does.


44 posted on 08/30/2008 10:08:30 PM PDT by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: SMCC1
I’ve never heard the democrats claim that, and if they did, they’re wrong because the US Constitution provides no such provision. I’ve only heard the democrats blather on about “punishing” the oil companies for making profit. Alaska is essentially run from oil money, that’s why there’s no income tax. Washington doesn’t depend on oil like Alaska does.

You have not been listening very carefully. The rats are planning the same thing. The rats will pass a law providing royalty checks for selected rat constituents. There is no conceptual difference between a federal law and a part of a state constitution. Both accomplish the same thing: legalized theft of private property.

Those who defend this Alaska law should also agree with the rat plans for a windfall profits tax. If you disagree, I suspect it may be self interest. Perhaps you are a recipient of the Alaska royalty scam.

46 posted on 08/30/2008 10:18:47 PM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson