To: SeekAndFind
The Washington Post has done more investigative research in 12 hours on Palin than they have in four months of Obama.
60 posted on
08/29/2008 5:45:27 PM PDT by
Hildy
("We do not see things as they are. We see things as we are.")
To: Hildy
LOL! I wonder though, don’t you think they actually found the load of stuff on Obama and chose to squelch it? I mean, surely the WaPo has a better research staff than Sean Hannity and he’s been hitting these things on Obama for months before Corsi’s book cam eout! I don’t know, my FRiend, it appears the WaPo hide things they should have been reporting and now they are trying to change the subject by going all out for their chosen candidate.
86 posted on
08/29/2008 5:57:23 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: Hildy
The Washington Post has done more investigative research in 12 hours on Palin than they have in four months of Obama.
BINGO!! wish i knew how to resize your text....that needs to be in big bold text!
Great post!
105 posted on
08/29/2008 6:03:20 PM PDT by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: Hildy
The Washington Post has done more investigative research in 12 hours on Palin than they have in four months of Obama.
Of course, what did you expect ?
What we want to know is this --- WHAT IS THE REAL STORY ? Did she really use her position to bring down a person she disliked ?
THAT IS THE ISSUE. If there is a better explanation, let's hear it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson