Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Names Ash Housewares
You are correct. The folks at DU were insinuating the baby wasn't Sarah's, but her daughter Bristol's and that Sarah is trying to cover it up. They base this on an AP article from March that says she didn't "look pregnant" at that time. They are actually going out and finding pictures to try to prove it.

Disgusting, to say the least. I sure hope the people at DU that are spreading this crap kept their genes out of the pool.

58 posted on 08/29/2008 1:51:21 PM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: ravingnutter

I read that too (the insinuations that the new baby is Palin’s daughter’s baby, or that the daughter is expecting). That caused a minor brushfire too. The DUers who have become mothers while in their teens, and/or unmarried, burst into flames at the suggestion that this is slutty behavior. Loose-lipped moonbats were incinerated on the spot.
Meanwhile, Gerry Ferraro expresses approval at the choice of Palin.
In 2008, the nation is going to experience a huge science project called, “Women and Watching What You Say.” It will look like a failed souffle and at the wrong voice command it will spew lava. ;)


123 posted on 08/29/2008 3:04:14 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Obama bin Biden -- So let it be written; so let it be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson