Romney would have been the best pick.
This article highlights the problems with Sarah.
Sarah was a tactile choice. She was picked because she is a woman. Make NO MISTAKE about that. What she can do is peak the truth about oil and the polar bears. She has possibilities but by no means is she proven. We are hopeful that she has what it takes.
Not that it matters ... but I sorely wanted Mitt. He would be the best pick but McPain felt the need to cow tow to bigoted Evangelicals who HATE Mitt because he is a Mormon. Instead of being evangelicals ... they chose bigotry over prayer for those that are not saved.
So all things considered ... I understand why McPain picked her. Make NO BONES about it Sarah was a tactile pick and what tipped it over to her was the mere fact that she is a white woman who will hopefully woo disenchanted Hitlery voters based on her gender. Sarah appears to be a good woman but if she was a guy, she'd have been passed over - it was strictly a choice made on gender - TACTILE choice. I endorse her.
“Sarah was a tactile choice.”
Either the above is a Freudian slip revealing your lustful feelings towards the woman, or you actually meant “tactical” choice.
BTW - I DO care about the souls of mormons. That is one reason why I didn’t want a mormon elected to high office. It is spurious and insidious and damns those that partake of it.
I am an evangelist would would NEVER vote for Romney, and it’s not because I’m a bigot...heck, I’d vote for a Jewish pres, a Catholic pres, a Mormon pres, or an agnostic pres, IF they matched my values, which Romney clearly did not.
Romney stated he would ban semi-auto firearms and he only became a conservative after he decided to run for pres...I believe he was insincere in that conversion and that after he won he’d follow McCain down the path of “maverick” hate-conservatives policies and we’d get Mass II.
Ed