Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG

Please. He was a nothing Southern Governor from Arkansas with a sketchy record, at best. He was planning his run for months before walking on the national stage. Now who in their right mind would have told Huck he was Presidential material? The Clintons loved this guy, as did the national media.

I’m not one for conspiracy theories - I’m just connecting the dots. He split the base with Romney. If he was a true conservative, he would have bailed after the results showed he couldn’t win and was actually creating a Perot effect.


261 posted on 08/29/2008 12:37:16 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]


To: mabelkitty

My point was this: it’s still up to the base to coalesce around one candidate or someone not exactly to their liking will get the nomination.

I agree with you that Huck stayed in the race too long. But I also point out that it was some “conservatives” who kept voting for him long after it became obvious that he was doing a Perot on the party.


315 posted on 08/29/2008 3:05:35 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he said: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson