[palmer]

As far as I am concerned, third partyism is over for this election cycle. I also don't see eye-to-eye with Bob Barr and even though I was excited about his candidacy at first (he was great in the impeachment), he's been nothing but disappointing since on all sorts of PC issues like global warming. It is a sign of shallow thought and a willingness to go with the crowd (McCain is just as bad).

Palin isn't the miracle answer to all our problems, but it's the best we're going to get for this cycle. Your divisive attacks on McCain are getting very old, very fast. His honor and bravery as a POW were unquestionable. If you have something new to add, then add it, but don't keep sniping on the same themes.

[Harvey105]

I suppose a partial no answer is as close to an answer as you can get.

You speak of Palin, but I hadn’t mentioned her. Then, in your tag line, you got it almost totally wrong too. Plenty of people who were not going to vote McCain are now going to because they believe that she makes up for all of McCain’s ‘sins’.

You’ve decided that the time for ‘third parties’ is now over for this election, so everyone should shut up? I may have said that I was going to vote third party, but I don’t recall so yet again, your reply is non-responsive.

How is asking questions being divisive? Where did I question his bravery or service? I questioned the report of him being close to death and his recovery without medical intervention.

Is ‘Hall Monitor’ a paid position or volunteer?