If they really want to have some hope of success, they need to be able to come up with how failure of this propostion will stop heterosexuals from marrying. After all, if this is a “fight to preserve marriage”, then they’ll have to show how this will stop straight people from finding each other, marrying, and starting families together.
“...if this is a fight to preserve marriage, then theyll have to show how this will stop straight people from finding each other, marrying, and starting families together”
They don’t have to do anmything of the sort. Marrige has one definition that serves our society. Any attempt to blur that definition is in fact an attack on the institution of marrige itself for the purpose of destroying it. (Which in fact is what they are trying actually to do)