To: colorado tanker
NATO is in a much better position to assist the Baltics, for example.
Well, Georgia borders on Turkey, a NATO member, that also controls the entrance to the Black Sea (i.e. the Bosporus strait). That's also why already a number a NATO frigates are in the Region:
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/F214-L%C3%BCbeck-Plymouth_Sound.jpg/800px-F214-L%C3%BCbeck-Plymouth_Sound.jpg)
German Bremen class frigate "Lübeck"
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/81/ORP_Pu%C5%82aski.JPG/800px-ORP_Pu%C5%82aski.JPG)
Polish Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate "Generał Kazimierz Pułaski"
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/F-102_Almirante_Juan_de_Borbon_CSSQT.jpg)
Spanish Álvaro de Bazán class frigate
and of course, the USS Tailor
37 posted on
08/28/2008 12:26:28 PM PDT by
wolf78
To: wolf78
True, Turkey shares a short border with Georgia. Turkey, however, had no appetite for getting involved militarily in the defense of Georgia.
Turkey's military in the region historically was defensively oriented to stop a Russian and later Soviet attack. I'm not aware of any NATO plans to use Turkey as a base to defend Georgia. Also, the naval force appears to be European.
Georgia is such a narrow country and so easily cut in two from S. Ossetia, it poses real problems for any NATO force that would try to intervene from distant bases.
39 posted on
08/28/2008 2:12:16 PM PDT by
colorado tanker
(Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
To: wolf78
Cruser Moscow:
![](http://www.cruiser-moskva.info/photos/_2006_03_31_01.jpg)
Look on the supersonic missile containers. 16 supersonic missiles = 16 dead enemy ships.
42 posted on
09/04/2008 2:37:25 AM PDT by
RusIvan
(Saakashilli is should be tried as the war criminal)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson