Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

And your attitude won’t convince the naysayers. You’re not doing yourself any favors with the unearned arrogance btw. And all you can succeed in doing to me is make me laugh at you. And I do. I’ve known way too many of your kind over the years. You’re gonna go nowhere with that approach - and fast. I’m a reasonable guy and only ask that we sweat the details to get this right. Having a concept design is not the same as having a proven technology. I’ve worked long enough in aerospace to know the difference. Should we proceed with development? Yep. Should we work to remove the political barriers? Yep. But let’s not make promises we’re not entirely sure we can keep. That one thing that separates conservatives from liberals. Flame on. I’m off to work so don’t expect a response.


40 posted on 08/27/2008 9:37:27 AM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: RKV
"Having a concept design is not the same as having a proven technology. I’ve worked long enough in aerospace to know the difference."

All this stuff was taken past the "design concept" into working plants LONG ago--fuel reprocessing, fuel design, breeder reactors, you name it. And in virtually every case, the working prototypes were shut down due to eco-nutcase anti-nuke propaganda/hysteria, which, btw, was started and funded by the KGB. And it is propagated today by "useful idiots", who THINK they know something about the subject, when, in actual fact, they know very little.

46 posted on 08/27/2008 9:57:23 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson