Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reviews In: Hillary Grand Slam
SFGate: Politics Blog ^ | 8/26/8 | Carla Marinucci

Posted on 08/26/2008 9:22:29 PM PDT by SmithL

Denver -- It was powerful, it was passionate -- and from inside the hall here, it was one killer speech.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton brought the house down with her address tonight at the Democratic National Convention, where it looked to be about a 9-plus on the Richter scale.

The insiders had warned that Clinton had to deliver bigtime tonight -- for her legacy, and for her future, as well as for Obama.

Deliver she did. Republicans, of course, had their views -- that she delivered evidence that their guy, John McCain, is the only one ready to hit ground running at the White House. Here's some thoughts from critics and insiders:

*Phil Trounstine, Democratic strategist and Obama supporter: ''Sen. Clinton did everything she needed to do. She made it crystal clear to all of her supporters that it is their duty to fight on for her by supporting Barack Obama. If he becomes president, it will be in part because Hillary Clinton had the grace and strength to re-unite her party.''

*Ruth Sherman, author and communications consultant: ''I've never seen her this good, not even close. . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008dncconvention; dncconvention; hillary; nobama; piaps
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2008 9:22:29 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Any MSM bozo would be ridden out on a rail if they said Hill sucked.


2 posted on 08/26/2008 9:24:04 PM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Well, she should have spoke so passionately for herself earlier when she could have done so very easily, but she probably did not believe her own rhetoric in either event.


3 posted on 08/26/2008 9:24:25 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shankbear

Yep. I thought the speech wasn’t that great an endorsement. She talked a lot about herself and her campaign, and the history of women getting the right to vote. But she didn’t talk much about Obama.


4 posted on 08/26/2008 9:26:02 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

100% fantastic.

Thank G-d, the Dems benched her!


5 posted on 08/26/2008 9:26:31 PM PDT by WKL815 (If the phrase 'Personal Responsibility' makes you defensive, you may be a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

She could have given the same exact speech if the nominee was John Edwards.


6 posted on 08/26/2008 9:27:12 PM PDT by Revenge of Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Could they be any more nakedly partisan? Hillary quite possibly is the worse speaker of this generation. The notion that she can give a “powerful” speech is pure nonsense.


7 posted on 08/26/2008 9:29:39 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (http://www.iraqvetsforcongress.com ---- Get involved, make a difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Lets hope that was her swan song and she and her husband will fade into the annals of has beens.

As far as her speech If I was one of the 3o% of the Clinton supporters who are voting McCain, there was nothing in that speech to change my mind.

8 posted on 08/26/2008 9:31:00 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"Deliver she did."

She delivered the same old tired bullshit we have been fed for years. It is hard to tell who is the worst whore. Obama or Hillary.

9 posted on 08/26/2008 9:31:18 PM PDT by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Theodore R.

Maybe she didn’t believe her own rhetoric earlier in her campaign. I never quite understood her rationale for running for president. She grew up in a middle class family in the middle of America, she wanted to renew the promise of America, take back America, provide socialized medicine, etc. And then Obama comes along with “change” so she says she’s been making change for 35 years. Her whole campaign was a joke. Her alleged qualifications and understanding of the middle class problems and all of it was all smoke and mirrors.

What really happened was that she and Bill decided shortly after the 2004 election that 2008 was her year, because there would be no incumbent president running. And since the party out of power sometimes gets an advantage after two terms of anyone’s presidency, the Clintons decided it was her time. Whether she was a good candidate or not didn’t matter, because she was “inevitable”. The hubris of Bill and Hill made her campaign crash and burn.

Given their history, it’s hard to believe anything that Bill and Hillary say at face value.


11 posted on 08/26/2008 9:32:53 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WKL815

Every dem I know was pissed when Obama passed over Hillary for Biden.

DARN


12 posted on 08/26/2008 9:33:43 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

I swear God looks out for this country. He (or She), sent Obama to slay Hillary...then sent Hillary to show up Obama...then sent Biden to show the measure of the man who wants to be president...then sent McCain to show what Qualified really means...I wonder whom God will send next?


13 posted on 08/26/2008 9:34:42 PM PDT by johnnycap (I would really like the model of Civil Forum that Warren has created to be repeated across the count)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

She made a campaign speech for HRC, not nobama.

I dont know what if anything could derail nobama from getting the Dem nomination at this point, unless he gave it up himself.


14 posted on 08/26/2008 9:35:15 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
"Lets hope that was her swan song and she and her husband will fade into the annals of has beens."

Don't bet the farm on it. They are like heroin addicts. They can't kick the habit.

15 posted on 08/26/2008 9:35:54 PM PDT by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Hillary did well.

She was more human and less shrill than previous efforts. She did herself more good than she did good for Obama.

Obama's objective was to convince Hillary supporters the they could conscientiously, even enthusiastically, transfer their support to Obama. I think Hillary delivered in the sense that her followers can now in good conscience transfer their affiliation to Obama. I do not think they will do so enthusiastically.

Hillary's objective was more nuanced. Her task was to propitiate expectations for party loyalty and to avoid criticism for being a sore head but not to generate enough enthusiasm to get Barak Obama elected. I think she probably succeeded in both of these objectives.

Despite Hillary's repeated exhortations to elect Obama. I did not get the feeling that the enthusiasm she generated was anything but transitory, without legs, and did not reach beyond the hall. In other words, television viewers, the only ones who count, will not have been moved enough to walk their precincts or even take out their billfolds.

Best case analysis for the Obama forces, Hillary might have moved sentiment a point or two but it is not a groundswell, it is not permanent, and will not have markedly improved Obama's chances.


16 posted on 08/26/2008 9:37:28 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
well, considering the source: SFGate.com... "the Karaoke Journalists are @ it again."
17 posted on 08/26/2008 9:37:30 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I heard some of it on the radio and it sounded awful.


18 posted on 08/26/2008 9:38:47 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham ("The land of the Free...Because of the Brave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Reviews In...

I wonder if, to save time, their GOP convention articles are already written.

-PJ

19 posted on 08/26/2008 9:39:37 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Obama's "citizen of the world" is the 2008 version of Kerry's "global test.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Kinda makes you want to go out and buy some cattle futures.


20 posted on 08/26/2008 9:40:02 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson