[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

I don’t get it - it’s just about sex - and his “private life” - isn’t this what we were told during clinton?

[Stoat]

I don’t get it - it’s just about sex - and his “private life” - isn’t this what we were told during clinton?

• Clinton was Prez and was therefore in a position to do far more favors than Edwards
• Clinton conducted (and perhaps still conducts) himself as a single man, and so he has the support of the hopeful, ugly Socialist women.

[CaliGirlGodHelpMe]

“I don’t get it - it’s just about sex - and his “private life” - isn’t this what we were told during clinton?”

We were told a lot of things during Monicagate. For example, that it’s “okay to lie under oath as long as it’s about sex.” Obviously untrue.

This man was running for President. He was a Senator. The point is that if he would cheat, lie to and betray his own cancer-victim wife, how could any of his constituents trust him? If he can’t run his own private life with morality and honesty, how could we expect that he would run his political career (or any position of great trust) with anything better?