[monday]

“IIANM, they said that the way she put it on her website implied that it was authorized by the city.”

From what I gather reading her website only a moron would assume the link was authorized by the city. Her position against the mayor and police department is pretty clear. The is a free speech issue and she has already won is the courts in WI follow the constitution.

[contemplator]

From what I gather reading her website only a moron would assume the link was authorized by the city

I'm not following the logic that one has to get permission to link to a government site that is funded by the taxpayers. As far as that goes, I was under the impression that everyone had the right to link to any website they chose to. If the owner of the website wants to restrict access to their site then it's up to them to implement some sort of authentication system, but the right to an 'unlisted' web address doesn't exist as far as I know. It's the content of a site that might possibly be copyright protected, not the address itself.