Posted on 08/24/2008 8:10:04 AM PDT by pissant
So you don’t have any facts to add then, I accept your apology.
WORSE. They are still listing Techdude's bogus research.
Have you contacted the Berg guy yet?
I think they disowned techdude in this article, did they not?
Not on ObamaCrimes.com -- both of his main reports are listed.
We need to have Berg pull them off the site, ASAP, lest he be also tainted as was Israel Insider, Atlas Shruggs, TexasDarling, and anyone else who were suckered in.
Stupid me. I thought you were talking about Israeli insider and not Berg’s lawsuit. Anyone hear from techdude lately?
I fired off an email to him earlier this morning. It would help if others would also write to him, asking his to pull Techdude's articles, while also mentioning in passing, that "other" researcher. ;-)
I’ll email him too. I’ll direct him to your website.
Not!
First off, we know that members of Annenberg, who own FactCheck, cannot be trusted to tell or do the right thing.
Secondly, I disagree with some of Israel Insider's observation about the date/time stamp:
Factcheck.org posted 9 photographs of what it claimed were different aspects of Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth", all in less than optimal and idiosyncratic lighting conditions. All of them were taken over a less than seven minute period on March 12, 2008 from 10:40:18 to 10:47:02 at night.
The photographer actually used precision and speed in taking these photos indoors, using color-corrected lighting (which is why you do not see any orange or reddish tinges in them). Rather than calling the work of the photographer, "shoddy," based on the short, elapsed time it took to take all nine shots, that's precisely what an experienced photographer does -- namely, take good shots as quickly as possible.
Rather than it being an oversight on the photographer's part, I think that the photographer -- and the camera itself -- "knew" that the time/date stamp was accurate.
- Because FactCheck and Obama refuse to allow us to actually obtain or study the document in question. As a wise man once said, "The Devil is in the details.".
This is like someone dangling a dollar bill a couple of feet from your face, and then asking you if you can discern wether or not it is counterfeit. Then they tell you that because Washington's picture, a serial number and the words "Federal Reserve Note" are all visible to the eye, that it is, in fact, genuine.
And when you say, "Let me take a closer look...", they decline.
Then they run around and try to tell people that you failed to prove that the money was fake.
That's the kind of scam being perpetuated with Obama's CoLB.
bump
Hi Skooz! Thanks for the bump.
Great analogy! Even though I already used it with a $20 as the counterfeit bill.
I spoke woith him today. Thanks.
Yes I did, but I spoke longer with his assistant.
How did it go?
I honestly was not aware of that. ;^O
Passionately stated. But in your essay there is no answer as to where this man came from! There is no proof presented that he is even an American citizen. What proof can you or anyone else present that he is natural born American citizen who is Constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States of America?
then go there and ask
You keep avoiding the issue.
Why in the hell should I have to shell out $$$ dollars for airfare and a hotel stay, when FactCheck could easily put the scans on their site, right now,- for free.
What's FactCheck's justification for withholding the scans...?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.