Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conroe CO2 flood set as Tinsley responds {enhanced oil production}
Oil & Gas Journal ^ | Aug. 21, 2008 | OGJ editors

Posted on 08/21/2008 1:09:45 PM PDT by thackney

Denbury Resources Inc., Dallas, plans to pay $600 million or more to acquire giant Conroe field north of Houston where it intends to begin injecting carbon dioxide within 5 years in a development project worth $750 million-1 billion.

Recovery at Conroe from CO2 injection is estimated at 130 million boe, depending on the ultimate recovery factor, and the properties contain 18.2 million boe of proved conventional reserves. Conroe is producing 2,500 boe/d to the interest to be acquired from an undisclosed private seller, which will retain a 2.8% interest, and unspecified other interest.

Meanwhile, the company booked 29.8 million bbl of proved oil reserves as of June 30 at giant Tinsley field, Yazoo County, Mississippi, which has responded to CO2 enhanced oil recovery and has become the company's highest valued field. This is 75% of the anticipated ultimate tertiary oil expected to be recovered from Tinsley, which averaged 675 b/d in the quarter ended June 30.

Denbury is in final stages of completing a 136 sq mile 3D seismic survey at Jackson Dome in Mississippi to identify more structures that might hold natural CO2. All but one of 11 structures it has tested so far contain large CO2 volumes.

Denbury said it might later sell its North Texas Barnett shale properties to finance purchase of the 91.4% interest in Conroe field.

Shipping CO2 to Conroe in Montgomery County, Tex., will require construction of an 80-mile spur from its planned 24-in., 314-mile Green pipeline from Donaldsonville, La., to Hastings field south of Houston. Green construction could start by yearend. The spur, cost not yet known, could go in service as early as 2012.

Denbury has signed three offtake agreements to buy as much as 800 MMcfd of CO2 from proposed gasification plants and seven letters of intent that bring its total potential volumes if all projects were built to 2.5 bcfd. The company believes that enough projects will be built to match or exceed its estimated deliverability of natural CO2 from Jackson Dome.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: co2; energy; energyfacts; oil
I wonder if these folks will get some of Al Gore's Carbon Credits while producing oil?
1 posted on 08/21/2008 1:09:46 PM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

If they get the gas deep enough and hot enough they may be able to make more crude.


2 posted on 08/21/2008 1:23:22 PM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Denbury said it might later sell its North Texas Barnett shale properties to finance purchase of the 91.4% interest in Conroe field.
~~~
They must be pretty sure they can make a big profit,,,

One way or the other...


3 posted on 08/21/2008 1:32:34 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

They’d need some hydrogen down there too . . .


4 posted on 08/21/2008 1:32:34 PM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

According to their annual reports, they estimate this method of production breaks even at $35 per barrel.


5 posted on 08/21/2008 1:37:45 PM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ruiner

According to their annual reports, they estimate this method of production breaks even at $35 per barrel.
~~~
TANKS,,,well cost must be high if they’re drillin’ wells

like they are around here($7 million)in the Haynesville

Shale...


6 posted on 08/21/2008 1:55:38 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I can’t help but wonder why they’re piping CO2 in when they could simply make it on-site...


7 posted on 08/21/2008 4:11:37 PM PDT by Redbob ("WWJBD" ="What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

One cannot “make” CO2 on site. CO2 is naturally occuring (all animals breathe it out) and is produced in natural phenomema like a volcano. However, to capture the very large amounts they are talking about here requires sourcing from a place like a chemical plant where it is an unwanted byproduct.

80 miles is not all that far to ship CO2 compared with other areas where it is used in oil business.


8 posted on 08/21/2008 5:04:16 PM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Probably because it cost more to make it.


9 posted on 08/21/2008 7:12:30 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson