Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

The liberal’s need to maintain the ruse that the unborn are not living persons is intense, as shown with Obama’s phrasing, but the reality is democrats don’t really give a damn if these ‘things’ being slaughtered are human persons. Protecting ALL rites of slaughtering the alive unborn are the empowerment scheme for the demcorat party and more important to democrap voters than the children being slaughtered, as black people prove every election cycle that returns democrats to office under the ‘awning’ of the massive number of alive unborn black children slaughtered every day because democrats oppose ending this evil.


43 posted on 08/21/2008 4:29:22 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


Sean Hannity allowed on air a black woman who tried to make the case that Obama was more accurate than McCain in his response to the ‘dealing with evil’ question because evil can only be defeated by God. I was screaming at the radio for Sean to ask this poor buffoon how black people continuing to promote the evil of aborting their posterity and empowering the demon democrats to remain the defenders of this evil was not aiding evil! Poor gentleman Sean dropped the ball.


45 posted on 08/21/2008 4:34:29 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
Well, it's pretty clear: Obama was more concerned to defend abortion rights than the child's, arguing that a possible application of equal protection from declaring children "born alive" from botched abortions as children and persons deserving rights and medical care was too risky. It was more important for him that the children be left to die in in order to defend the absurd logic of abortion rights and Roe vs. Wade. That's damning.

There is no other way to read this. He did not want children "born alive" from botched abortions protected as children and legal persons with constitutional rights. Talk about Solomonic Justice!

The child is alive, outside the womb. How could it not be a "child"???

He followed the talking points from Planned Parenthood and the abortion lobby.

He couldn't vote to protect these children because that might mean "equal protection" for children in the womb! Just...WOW!

46 posted on 08/21/2008 4:41:12 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson