Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mvpel

I noticed that Miller speaks to militarily useful weaponry, whereas the GCA speaks of hunting weaponry. So by one standard we can’t have firearms not suitable for hunting protected, and by another we can’t have firearms not suitable for the military to use. I guess this leaves us a few single shot 22’s. Oh wait, you say the Resistance in Nazi Occupied Europe...


73 posted on 08/25/2008 9:41:23 PM PDT by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Apogee

Well, the GCA was based on the Nazi Weapons Law, so that particular piece of Congressional excrement has a big target on its back in the wake of Miller and Heller.


74 posted on 08/26/2008 4:44:56 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson