a hard rain gonna fall one day
The ATF is the worst among a bunch of out of control gubmint agencies. They should be disbanded, and most of their JBTs sent to jail.
Posted on 08/21/2008 1:33:43 AM PDT by neverdem
No, and don't expect McCain to do anything either.
oh I don’t.
ain’t but one thing gonna clean up that sorta problem
a hard rain gonna fall one day
or folks just may roll over
Not that I'm aware of. This is the last that I read.
Lower courts make all sorts of "interpretations" of "fresh" Supreme Court cases. The Real Test is what the appeals court or the Supreme Court itself will do.
a hard rain gonna fall one day
The ATF is the worst among a bunch of out of control gubmint agencies. They should be disbanded, and most of their JBTs sent to jail.
Should have argued that the BATFE had no statutory authority granted to it by the Constitution as their very existence violates Art 6 para 2, Amd 2, and Amd 10.
Oh boy, Liz Michael is not going to like that one bit.
along the same lines but a bit different and written by TM
http://www.enemiesforeignanddomestic.com/
She wouldn’t? Why? I just read her page...again. seems like she and I are theoretically in agreement.
She doesn’t advocate violence, nor do I.
She states that it will happen. I state that it will be interesting of it does.
Added to my “wish list”.
read a couple chapter on line and itll be a done deal...did fer me...
The problem is purposeful misinterpretation, as in "that view is inconvenient to the idea of the Vanguard of the Proletariat leading the masses to a Socialist utopia."
Still, we're headed in the right direction and in a generation or two, we may be able to shoot back in life threatening situations outside our homes.
Sooner than that - many states have adopted the "Castle Doctrine" and even expanded it to other places that are similar to a home, like your car. Come to Texas, and if someone is legitimately threatening you then you can safely (from a legal perspective) end the threat on a permanent basis anywhere except in a very few places (where, even here, we aren't "allowed" to carry).
Historians will look back and wonder why we didn't exercise our right sooner.
Fear. That and really crappy judges and a bunch of authoritarian, paternalistic officials who weren't stopped by the populace (i.e. it all goes back to fear, or Kim DuToit's "Pussification of the Western Male").
I noticed that Miller speaks to militarily useful weaponry, whereas the GCA speaks of hunting weaponry. So by one standard we can’t have firearms not suitable for hunting protected, and by another we can’t have firearms not suitable for the military to use. I guess this leaves us a few single shot 22’s. Oh wait, you say the Resistance in Nazi Occupied Europe...
Well, the GCA was based on the Nazi Weapons Law, so that particular piece of Congressional excrement has a big target on its back in the wake of Miller and Heller.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.