Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romanian president: Kosovo issue foreshadows similar direction in South Ossetia
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-08/21/content_9563328.htm ^

Posted on 08/20/2008 3:23:19 PM PDT by kronos77

BUCHAREST, Aug. 20 (Xinhua) -- What happened with Kosovo foreshadows a similar direction in South Ossetia, the visiting Romanian President Traian Basescu said on Wednesday in Chisinau.

"At present, sovereign and independent countries are dismantled in the name of collective rights of the minorities," Basescu said when talking with his Moldovan counterpart Vladimir Voronin.

"This is what happened with Kosovo and Serbia lost a part of its territory, and the things foreshadow a similar direction in South Ossetia and, should I dare say it, in Abkhazia," the Romanian president stressed.

"You know that Romania is among the countries that did not recognize Kosovo, considering that the decision of setting up a state on the soil of another sovereign and independent state runs counter to the laws of an international right, runs counter to the principle of territorial integrity and inviolability of state borders," said Basescu.

"No kind of right can prevail upon the one of the national integrity, sovereignty and inviolability of state borders of an independent state," Basescu said, stressing that Romania is an unreserved supporter of the integrity and sovereignty of the Republic of Moldova.

In the context of the frozen conflicts in the area of the BlackSera, the two heads of state examined the situation of the conflict in Moldova's Transdniestr, concluding that "this conflict perfectly matches to what happened in Kosovo, to what happened in South Ossetia."

Basescu emphasized that the situation in South Ossetia is a proof of the fact that these frozen conflicts do not have a correct tension defusing mechanism.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.xinhuanet.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: balkans; geopolitics; georgia; kosovo; ossetia; russiantrollfarm; serbia; southossetia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 08/20/2008 3:23:19 PM PDT by kronos77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joan; Smartass; zagor-te-nej; Lion in Winter; Honorary Serb; jb6; Incorrigible; DTA; ma bell; ...

One smart and brave president!


2 posted on 08/20/2008 3:23:56 PM PDT by kronos77 (Kosovo is Serbian Jerusalem. No Serbia without Kosovo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kronos77

So, do you condemn Russia for attacking Georgia when they tried to retain South Ossetia the way you condemned Nato for attacking Serbia when they were trying to retain Kosovo? Or is your morality situational?


3 posted on 08/20/2008 3:26:01 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; kronos77

Kosovo and Ossetia are completely different situations. Here are some examples:

1) Kosovo wanted independence. Russia has never sought independence for Ossetia. Russia wants to absorb Southern Ossetia, with what appears now to be the ultimate goal of absorbing all of Georgia.

2) Kosovo was legally part of Yugoslavia but not of Serbia. Southern Ossetia is legally a part of Georgia.

3) The six former constituent republics of Yugoslavia, which all exercised their pre-existing constitutional right to secede from rule by Belgrade, are seated as members of the United Nations, as, indeed, is Georgia. Twenty out of 27 states of the European Union have also recognized the government of Kosovo as an entity de jure as well as de facto. No one, not even Russia recognizes South Ossetia as an independent nation.

and it goes on....


4 posted on 08/20/2008 3:33:51 PM PDT by flyfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: kronos77
Romania has a few million Hungarians in Transylvania. Where does it end? If there isn't respect for the territorial integrity of nations, no nation's existence will be secure.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

6 posted on 08/20/2008 3:45:33 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

Kosovo is still legally part of Serbia. Check UN resolution 1244.


7 posted on 08/20/2008 4:13:49 PM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 authorised an international civil and military presence in Kosovo, then part of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, placing it under interim UN administration. It was adopted on 10 June 1999. Both sides in the conflict subsequently adopted it in the Kumanovo Treaty.

Yugoslavia isn’t the same as Serbia.


8 posted on 08/20/2008 4:27:17 PM PDT by flyfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kronos77
One smart and brave president!

I think if I was to be put in charge of the affairs of state of a newly-independent nation, the first nation's diplomatic recognition I'd want would be Switzerland's.

Second would be Romania's.

9 posted on 08/20/2008 4:42:12 PM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flyfree
Welcome newbie! You will quickly find that bogus claims are quickly shot down.

Kosovo and Ossetia are completely different situations. Here are some examples:

1) Kosovo wanted independence. Russia has never sought independence for Ossetia. Russia wants to absorb Southern Ossetia, with what appears now to be the ultimate goal of absorbing all of Georgia.

2) Kosovo was legally part of Yugoslavia but not of Serbia. Southern Ossetia is legally a part of Georgia.

3) The six former constituent republics of Yugoslavia, which all exercised their pre-existing constitutional right to secede from rule by Belgrade, are seated as members of the United Nations, as, indeed, is Georgia...

1) The South Ossetians have voted overwhelming for independence. Do some research. You can look it up.

2)Kosovo is a province in Serbia, sovereign Serbian territory. Check UN resolution 1244.

South Ossetia was an autonomous region within georgia. When Georgia broke away from the soviet Union, South Ossetia broke away from Georgia.

3) This is funny. Can you even name the six former republics?

10 posted on 08/20/2008 4:58:13 PM PDT by F-117A (Ne nuntium necare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
LOL, and wait, when will someone condemn Russia for blitzing Grozny over their separatist desires?

Everyone is a hypocrite, and the Georgian people are the ones suffering for it.

11 posted on 08/20/2008 5:19:58 PM PDT by MarMema (The people of Georgia have cast their lot with the free world, and we will not cast them aside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: F-117A
1) The South Ossetians have voted overwhelming for independence. Do some research. You can look it up.
And you can look up that the European oversight body rejected the results because ethnic Georgians were not allowed to vote. What I said was Russia isn't interested in independence for SO. Look for yourself. What Russia is doing is trying to absorb SO into Russia. Heck, they even put billboards of Putin up in 2007 with the title "Our President" in the capital of SO. Look it up!

<2)Kosovo is a province in Serbia, sovereign Serbian territory. Check UN resolution 1244.
UN Resolution 1244 made Kosovo a part of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, not Serbia. Look it up!

South Ossetia was an autonomous region within georgia. When Georgia broke away from the soviet Union...
And now Russia wants to make it part of Russia. Russia doesn't want to give it independence.

3) This is funny. Can you even name the six former republics?

The six constituent republics that were pulled together to form Yugoslavia in 1946 were:

Slovenia, Serbia, Montenegro, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Macedonia

12 posted on 08/20/2008 5:21:25 PM PDT by flyfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: flyfree
The six former constituent republics of Yugoslavia, which all exercised their pre-existing constitutional right to secede from rule by Belgrade.

OK, so when did Serbia exercise it's "pre-existing constitutional right" to secede from rule by Belgrade?

This is the constitution imposed by the communist dictator Tito, right?

13 posted on 08/20/2008 7:22:54 PM PDT by F-117A (Ne nuntium necare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Hungry would love to get that land back. I think that many of the Hungarians have been Romanianized though.


14 posted on 08/20/2008 7:27:03 PM PDT by Tramonto (Regime change in Russia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

Kosovo is not one of them so you just killed your own argument.


15 posted on 08/20/2008 8:16:12 PM PDT by montyspython (Love that chicken from Popeye's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

You are way, way over your head.


16 posted on 08/20/2008 8:25:56 PM PDT by montyspython (Love that chicken from Popeye's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F-117A

What we have here is yet another casualty of ignorance.


17 posted on 08/20/2008 8:27:17 PM PDT by montyspython (Love that chicken from Popeye's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: flyfree; kronos77
When you copy talking points from an article, it is best to check them first and to give credit to the author!

Polly want a cracker?

18 posted on 08/21/2008 5:49:14 AM PDT by F-117A (Ne nuntium necare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F-117A

How embarrassing.


19 posted on 08/21/2008 9:56:51 AM PDT by montyspython (Love that chicken from Popeye's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

Flyfree, here’s a thought experiment for you. In 5-10 years, Latinos will be the absolute majority throughout the Southwest, at which point they angrily cite the US invasion and annexation of the Mexican War to declare their own sovereignty. However, rather than “returning the region to Mexico,” they proclaim a new nation independent of both the USA and Mexico— the Republic of Aztlan.

(To be perfectly honest, from the standpoint of economic survival it might actually be a good thing for the Southwest to leave as Aztlan, since at least that way, the budding Third World region of the Southwest would stop being such an utter parasite on the resources generated by the rest of the country.)

The Lakota Sioux then follow and formally secede their territory in the Dakotas, while the Hawaiians do the same on the islands. Soon it’s the Alaskan Aleuts following suit on the same grounds, followed by Florida, Guam and Vermont, and finally by majority-Arab Michiganistan in the Upper Midwest. Simultaneous separatist movements break out and explode in England (Scotland having already left the UK), with Northern Ireland leaving and then northern England, by now predominantly South Asian Muslim, leaving as “Englandistan” while “Londonistan” does the same in the southeast. In Australia, the Aborigines do the same, while predominantly SE Asian Muslim Sydney and Melbourne secede to become “Australastan.”

You see, flyfree, Kosovo set an extremely dangerous precedent that is already boomeranging on the US, United Kingdom and Australia. While some such movements may be ostensibly more justifiable than others (e.g. in the case of the indigenous peoples), many others involve relatively recent migrations, especially by Muslims.

This is exactly what happened in Kosovo, historically the heart of Serbia and the site of the Serbs’ stand against the Turks in 1389 that saved Europe. However, after World War II, Muslim Albanians flooded into Kosovo with an extremely high level of illegal immigration and high birth rates, at which point the KLA began to attack Serb civilians and police, then claim “atrocities” when the Serbs, naturally, fought back against the criminals. Both the Clinton and Bush Administrations were stupid enough to listen to them. And now, the effects are coming back to bite us as well. Based on the Kosovo precedent— which is now an established aspect of US policy— you can basically kiss the Aztlan goodbye. Followed by Hawaii, the Dakotas... you get the picture.


20 posted on 08/21/2008 11:03:05 AM PDT by Javeth (Free the Naga Christians of Nagaland in India! http://tinyurl.com/2o4vf3 Nagalim is a nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson