A big problem is, do you trust the ‘ballistic fingerprint’ voodoo enough to risk it? I don’t..
How about if they just force every male in a city to undergo DNA testing after any rape? At least that’s accurate, and about as ‘fair’.
But it isn't an all out ballistic testing of every single weapon in the county... it is a specific, narrow range of caliber handguns. Aren't you going a little overboard here?
I would think if the police is taking a drastic step like this... it means there is little or no forensic evidence to go forward with...
You mean like they do in Britain, the bastion of the surveillance camera?