[DustyMoment]

I'm not sure that ‘flake” is a term I would use to describe the Obamessiah. To me, flakes are, among other things, unreliable. One thing about Obama is he is NOT unreliable. Above all else, we can rely on his naked obsession with power and the need to gain power for the sake of his handlers and ‘shadow puppet masters’ who want to destroy America.

I'm not sure that the Obamessiah would have even selected the path he is currently following. To me, he lacks the innate drive to have made these choices for himself but, rather, appears to be someone whose choices have been made for him for a VERY long time. IOW, he is beginning more and more to appear to be the quintessential “Manchurian Candidate”.

There are too many nagging questions about his origins and his publicly acknowledged history is cloudy at best. His failure (or outright refusal) to address these issues and put them to rest is troubling, to say the least.

In the late 70s, the Dems gave us one of the most indisputably inept presidents in recent memory and, perhaps, ever. In 2008, they are giving us a candidate that could easily wrest that title away from Jimmuh without breaking a sweat.

[nikos1121]

A flake in the Obama sense would be a black man who ain’t hip, who can’t dance in rythm or dribble a basketball.

For example Al Gore was a flake and still is. Kerry acted at times Flakey.

No, Obama is not a flake or at least not that bad a flake.

What will defeat this guy is the fact that he is a conman...a conniver...shifty. The kind of guy all of us have met at some point in our lives, and we’ve fallen for what he’s selling.