it was lop sided! wasn’t it?
the remark is appropriate to people at a lower level; oba mao 8
makes big bucks and is one of the 100, a u.s senator.
and, inappropriate to a religious discussion.
I can’t recall the last time any journalist took a liberal moderator on any of the debates to task for asking “unfair” questions of a Republican.
The forum for this event was in a church, it was not going to be a “secular” event.
The forum did not violate 501c rules as it sought out and got responses from the candidates of both major parties. THAT (a counter response) is the standard that is also pushed by the “fairness doctrine” of commercial enterprises that receive no tax-free status.
Under fairness doctrine, you don’t have to seek out a “credible” person to voice “the other side”. You could even have Hillary and Obama debate the war as long as one agrees to argue the “for” side of the issue.