Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
This can be a burden, and a lot of scientists and conservationists might go along with the idea that the law needs some changes. Rules have already been revised numerous times. But at a time when scientists say species are declining an epochal rate, do we really want to eliminate science from decisions on the fate of 1,353 animals and plants on the U.S. threatened or endangered species list?

Considering how many "scientists" are dragging us down the bottomless tunnel of "Global Warming" these new rule changes are a godsend. No more can these so-called experts hold up projects for years at a time.

11 posted on 08/19/2008 4:20:00 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (A kid at McDonalds has more real-world work experience than Barack Hussein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VeniVidiVici
"when scientists say species are declining "

A "sociologist" is not a scientist. They are leftist created civil servants.

yitbos

13 posted on 08/19/2008 4:26:19 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson