Posted on 08/18/2008 10:37:17 AM PDT by pabianice
Well, the Examiner article above confirms what I have already told you. The story starts at the #DongGO blog and was written by Collier. If you google him, you can see the many places on the internet he posted the article.
Then Maulkin picked it up. Then WND picked it up. Now the Examiner has picked it up. Do you understand that the Examiner is fringe just like Maulkin and WND.
So what is the credibility. Carter and Maulkin acknowledge that CLNC is a different company from Mesa Power. Or Mesa Petroleum. Or Mesa Water.
But then they say that what benefits CLNC also benefits Pickens' other companies.
That is just not true.
So, can you or Maulkin, or Collier show how it benefits Mesa Power? Besides just saying that it does.
Good point Mr K !!
Stay Safe !
That's a quote from the above article. Are you saying that, according to your well-placed sources, that is false?
And in California, and the reason that Pelosi bought stock in CLNC, there are about 8000 junker shuttle trucks hauling containers between the ports and the inland ports that will be replaced with new, CNG fueled trucks.
“This is amazingly brazen corruption......”
This is a poster image for term limits.
Maybe you should tell that to T. Boone Pickens. He thinks they do go together.
From: http://www.pickensplan.com/theplan/
We currently use natural gas to produce 22% of our electricity. Harnessing the power of wind to generate electricity will give us the flexibility to shift natural gas away from electricity generation and put it to use as a transportation fuel
Read what Inhofe thinks of Pickens and CNG
Click thru to the source to read CEO Littlefair's overview of CLNC
I bet one is more lucrative than the other.
Regulation of one vs. market prices for the other.
something stinks in Denmark and it has a Texas drawl.
Panhandle/South Plains Loop Project
Keep in mind that the HL Hunt family controls Sharyland and in Texas the HL Hunt Family is a much bigger dog than T. Boone Pickens.
Agreed. So why do you believe that wind power has nothing to do with using natural gas as vehicle fuel? That is the justification given by the Pickens Plan.
I've been following this. I was very disappointed with ERCOT's decision not to upgrade to 765 kV. In my opinion, the 345 kV is a short-sided decision by folks who have fought against 765 kV in ERCOT for far too many years.
But that doesn't mean that everything in the Pickens Plan is not worthwhile.
“It is difficult to imagine a more unlikely pair of investors than House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens.”
Are you kidding? All the global elite are in bed with each other.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.