Apologetics, evidence from revelation, rhetoric instead of reasoning. The usual nonsense we see on these threads.
You know, pretty much the opposite of the scientific method.
Apologetics, evidence from revelation, rhetoric instead of reasoning. The usual nonsense we see on these threads.
You know, pretty much the opposite of the scientific method.
MmmmmmmmmImmmmm thinking you just through one of your own under the bus! LMAO!
But since you’re still whining...>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast ‘computer program’ of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require – or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have – or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life – the foundation of evolution - is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact.
http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/scientists/