Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Deaf Smith
"The lesson?... and shoot to kill."

NO

To stop the threat.

Exactly. Killing the bad guy may be a consequence of stopping the threat, but it should never be the main objective. The very first words you say to an officer (or 911 dispatcher) after something like this are the most important words you may ever speak. LEO's are there to collect evidence and document what happened. Saying "I was shooting to kill the guy" will not help you at trial.

20 posted on 08/18/2008 6:53:01 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (National Enquirer - The paper of record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Niteranger68; Deaf Smith

Point taken. It may well be one in the same since we’re talking a center mass shot but the word choice will make a difference - in the court room.


21 posted on 08/18/2008 6:58:04 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (College kid: "Do you have a minute for Obama?" NVA: "Not now or ever.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Niteranger68
The very first words you say to an officer (or 911 dispatcher) after something like this are the most important words you may ever speak. LEO's are there to collect evidence and document what happened. Saying "I was shooting to kill the guy" will not help you at trial.

You want to say something like "He gave me no choice! I was sure he was about to kill me. I had to stop him!" Then you say "I want a lawyer." And then you shut up.

And if you can't say these things with a clear conscience, you have no business pulling the trigger.

-ccm

35 posted on 08/18/2008 9:35:33 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson