To: swarthyguy
As far as Americans go-—
They just want to know that someone runs Pakistan who will keep Jihadists far away from the nukes. I know India has much bigger problems with these Muslim pests
71 posted on
08/18/2008 12:59:28 PM PDT by
dennisw
(That Muhammad was a charlatan. Islam is a hoax, an imperialistic ideology, disguised as religion.)
To: dennisw
Well, the conundrum is we like dealing with a single miltitary entity who can at least deliver some of what we want, whereas our policy logic forces into a situation where rather vapourous and nebulous civilian authorities are the ones we sort of have to go for because of our democracy rhetoric.
And, the country this time really seems to be aflame.
72 posted on
08/18/2008 2:11:25 PM PDT by
swarthyguy
(Osama Freedom Day: 2500 or so since September 11 2001! That's SIX +years, Dubya.)
To: dennisw
They just want to know that someone runs Pakistan who will keep Jihadists far away from the nukes. I know India has much bigger problems with these Muslim pests.
A nuclear India will act as a check upon a more Islamic-oriented head of Pakistan--but for how long? I guess we'll have to see who replaces the General, and just how far we're willing to go to secure a regional alliance.
79 posted on
08/18/2008 8:03:15 PM PDT by
Das Outsider
("Be content to remember that those who can make omelettes properly can do nothing else. "--Belloc)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson