Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY; dandelion
Actually, he didn't say he voted against it. This from the transcript referenced above (sorry for the all caps; I'm not shouting, just cutting and pasting):

I GUESS THE OTHER EXAMPLE FROM -- I'M NOT SURE THIS WAS A MORE OF A PARTISAN ISSUE, BUT IT WAS SOMETHING THAT I FELT VERY DEEPLY WAS WHEN I OPPOSED THE INITIAL DECISION TO GO INTO WAR IN IRAQ. THAT WAS A NOT A POPULAR VIEW AT THE TIME AND I WAS JUST STARTING MY CAMPAIGN FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE AND I THINK THERE WERE A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO ADVISED ME, YOU SHOULD BE CAUTIOUS. THIS IS GOING TO BE SUCCESSFUL. THE PRESIDENT HAS A VERY HIGH APPROVAL RATING AND YOU COULD END UP LOSING THE ELECTION AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THIS.

Frankly, I believe it's must more likely he adopted his opposition only after the dems started yowling about what a collosal failure the whole thing was (about a month in, wasn't it?).

16 posted on 08/17/2008 1:52:41 PM PDT by dorothy ( “Here comes the orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason.” —Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dorothy

He said back then that he doesn’t know how he would have voted because he wasn’t in the Senate and didn’t have access to the same reports - now he claims he firmly opposed it from the start. Both cannot be true.


24 posted on 08/17/2008 2:52:42 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson