My own post to that thread was this:
At this point I dont know who to believe or how much to believe them, but I do know that when it comes to government propaganda and MSM laziness and incompetence, there are always three sides to every coin.
Putin's evil lust for "power" using "naked aggression" versus Georgia's benign and perfectly understandable desire for "self defense" sounds way to cute for me. In any event, from your post it sounds like Russia mounted a stunning military victory using impeccable planning, covert operations, and a dazzling propaganda campaign. I hope our own military is taking notes.
But the basic facts, IMHO, are that the Russians instigated a reaction by Georgia which they had been planning on and then took abject advantage of it in the ways you just mentioned.
Having said that, I do not believe the Russians accounted for or were prepared for the visit of the five Presidents from Poland, Ukraine, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia which placed them in harms way and caused the Russian juggernaught to pause...or for the rapid insertion by Bush of US military personnel and equipment under the humanitarian mission goal.
So, this is a symbolic payback for our attack on Serbia. Russia blew up the bridge, has accused the Georgians of genocide, and is operating within Georgia calling themselves "peacemakers". They want to take the president of Georgia to court for crimes against humanity just as we participated in the criminalization of Milosevic.
They are dropping bombs in Georgia that say "For Bush" and "For NATO".
Oh yes, and I forgot, the power plant. The Russians just blew up a power plant. I remember when we bombed the one in Serbia quite well.