Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liberty2007
No I don't "prefer subersive groups like CAIR to operate un molested." I would prefer a situation in which marginal characters like Michael Savage do not latch on to conservatism as a way of getting a soapbox on national radio and, thereby, discredit the ideology to which I adhere.

Michael Savage has taken up any number of grand-sounding causes in the last few years and then dropped them when he lost interest, and (it seems to me) he loses interest when the "contributions" he solicits stop rolling in. I say "the last few years" because that's how long he's been embarrassing himself on an AM station that serves the market I live in. For all I know, he's been engaging in this tactic from day one in the San Francisco market in which he first gained fame. He is at best a phony, and does no one any good when he mounts a madcap campaign to confront an organization as dangerous as CAIR, which can now be expected to make maximum use of their "victory" over him.

People like Michael Savage have been around forever. You used to be able to hear them raving in mental asylums. These days, they can be given national radio hookups.

32 posted on 08/16/2008 12:52:36 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Without the second, the rest are just politicians' BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Steely Tom
Savage has his drawbacks but once again unless you have done the three hours yourself day after day it's hard to put forth a researched comment.

The one comment I like best from Savage's show(and I never listen to him unless I can't get Mark on the radio) is that liberalism truly is a mental disorder.

50 posted on 08/16/2008 4:11:33 PM PDT by rodguy911 (LAND OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson