Posted on 08/16/2008 9:30:20 AM PDT by cpforlife.org
The Congress is a non-judicial body, and most Americans either have enough sense, or know viscerally, that using it in that manner is tyranny.
There are rights that lack a remedy. Mrs. Schiavo's situation AFTER the Florida executive and judicial processes had run their course was one such situation.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Thank you. I was beginning to take it personally. At the time, I followed Terri’s case closely because I lived in Florida for many years. Under the circumstances, I still believe congress did the right thing getting involved. I feel very sorry for her family who loved her so much. Very sad story indeed.
Yes, it was a tyrannical use of power by the Federal government.
There are rights that lack a remedy. Mrs. Schiavo's situation AFTER the Florida executive and judicial processes had run their course was one such situation.
That is why we have the 10th Amendment!
IMHO, it was a failure by the Flordia Governor that ultimately killed Terri. Jeb failed to protect a dissabled citizen when the court system failed to function properly giving an unauthorized-to-order-a-death-sentence judge powers he must not have in our judicial system. If that isn’t a case for the chief lawenforcement officer of a state to forcefully step in and save an endangered citizen then there is none such. Jeb Bush was/is/will always be a cowardly feckless man. But that’s just my personal opinion, YMMV.
“Jeb Bush was/is/will always be a cowardly feckless man”
I agree and i think in runs in the Bush family .. the way
W. Bush lost eastern europe this week to the New Russian Empire.
Better not ever see a Bush even one hint at wanting to run
for President.
We could have saved our country a lot of problems if we picked Dole in 88 instead of reagan’s lapdog.
On many social issues, I may not be as conservative as some but I am strongly Pro Life and oppose abortion in all its forms.
My problem with the Schiavo case is that it was a far over reach of Federal Powers and provided Terri with protections of the Federal Government that have not been afforded others that were or are in a similar situation.
So, what is it that made Terri more Equal than others in the eyes of the Federal Government?
Should the U.S. Congress intervene in all cases where a family is in disagreement over the continued medical treatment of a family member? If not, why should those people not be afforded the rights under the Equal Protection Clause?
After all, Terri had the right to be the subject of a Special Session of Congress however, there are thousands of people in hospices at this very moment that will not have that same protection.
Nice try though, nice exposure for you ...
And the Man with the Air Pressure Plan thinks THIS was his biggest mistake?
Amen! I am right there with you, my brother / sister.
I am sorry but when I read the Constitution, I do not see where it is granted the power to go into Special Session for the sole purpose of involving itself in personal matters of a private family.
It does not sound like something that a Small Government Conservative would advocate.
But there seems to be very few of us Small Government Conservatives around these days.
That's all I need to read from you. You are obviously clueless on the case - deluded by the death cult.
Are you sure you meant to reply to me? I am entirely pro-life.
This response is not relevant to the case being discussed, because nobody was asking the House and Senate to "resolve family disputes." The purpose of their involvement was to allow a Federal Court to review the case to determine if Mrs. Schiavo's rights were being violated: the type of review which we routinely grant to convicted criminals under sentence of death.
No citizen, as Constitutionalists know, is to suffer the loss of life, liberty or property without due process of law. In this case, a county probate judge (County! Probate! Judge!) ordered a woman's death without ever seeing her, without even a smidgeon of written or otherwise documented evidence that she "wished to be killed," and without considering whether her legal guardian should be an estranged husband who had abandoned her medically and maritally, who has spent down trust funds which were supposed to be used to be used for her support, and who would further profit from her demise.
I personally think that Jeb Bush was derelict in his duty to uphold the Florida Constitution by failing to act to prevent the killing. But while getting a review in Federal court was not the most savvy move tactically, it was not a matter of presumptuous government meddling. Certainly not.
The woman in question had the right to have her intrests represented in court: especially her most fundamental interest, the right to simply go on living.
Nice guy he might be. That doesn't alter his beliefs. Many a nice guy has turned out to be ‘the devil in disguise’.
Nice guy he might be. That doesn't alter his beliefs. Many a nice guy has turned out to be ‘the devil in disguise’.
Yes. I meant to reply to you. I copied your own words. The part about “life support.” That’s where you are off track. Give that a think and get back to me.
Why not keep the Congress in session 365 days a year for the sole purpose of intervening in family disputes?
First off.. who said anything about keeping them in session all year for that?
Second.. do you call murder a “family dispute?”
If a governor can give a reprieve to a convicted murderer, the president can give a reprieve to an innocent woman.
So advocate the Federal Government stepping in to stop a family and doctors from making the decision to pull a family member from life support?
It is a liberal tactic to mischaracterize ... as in ‘for the personal matters of a private family.’ That you do not see the Schiavo case in a broader context than a private matter on the national stage where issues of right to life as unalienable speaks volumes on the state of your deadness. You keep it up and the disgust level will be intolerable. But then, it doesn’t seem to register with you anyway ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.