Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RogerFGay

Maybe people shouldn’t have children they don’t want to support.


5 posted on 08/16/2008 6:38:15 AM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: nobama08
Maybe people shouldn’t have children they don’t want to support.
Children should be outlawed altogether. There's always a possibility that someone might come along one day and accuse one or both parents of not wanting to support them. It's been a popular thing to say.
10 posted on 08/16/2008 6:50:24 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08

Stupid remark of the day, newbie. Right up there with “if you aren’t doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about.”

Brain dead, holier than thou “conservatives”. Buzz off.


40 posted on 08/16/2008 8:49:37 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nobama08
Maybe people shouldn’t have children they don’t want to support.

If an unmarried woman has a baby and decides not to give it up for adoption, whose decision is that? Who should be held responsible for that decision?

If the father of a child, by his overt actions, prevents or discourages the mother from giving it up for adoption, then the father can be regarded as having played a role in the decision and should be held financially responsible. If not, however, it seems to me that not only should financially responsibility fall solely on the woman making the decision, but that assigning any financial responsibility elsewhere will encourage women to make bad decisions.

101 posted on 08/16/2008 1:23:26 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson