Georgia Transportation Plan Demonstrates U.S. Flexibility, Responsiveness

WASHINGTON, Aug. 15, 2008 – The transport of more than 1,800 Georgian soldiers from Iraq to Tbilisi and humanitarian supplies from Germany to Georgia highlights the flexibility and responsiveness the U.S. military manifests, a senior U.S. Transportation Command officer said today.

“When this requirement came up, we had to figure out how do we make this happen quickly,” Air Force Maj. Gen. Michael C. Gould, TransCom’s director of operations and plans, aid in an interview today. “We had to get the Georgian troops back, and sustain what we have going in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

When the Russians attacked into South Ossetia last week, U.S. planners around the world quickly surged into motion and TransCom coordinated plans to accomplish these missions.

The Georgian government had sent a brigade’s worth of troops to Iraq as part of the coalition. The U.S. government had promised Georgian leaders that the troops would be transported home quickly if needed. The Russian invasion of Georgia fit that bill.

Gould said TransCom leaders worked closely with planners from the Air Force’s Air Mobility Command and with the operators at U.S. Central Command. Within 36 hours, the Air Force began flying the Georgians back to their capital at Tbilisi. Some of that time was spent collecting the Georgians from their duty stations in and around Baghdad and from Baqouba.

“In the 36 hours from notification to when we started flying missions, it all came together,” Gould said. Fourteen missions were required to fly the Georgians and their equipment home.

“It was a total teamwork effort from a planning perspective,” Gould said. “It was also a great team effort on the part of aircrew members, maintainers and loaders.”

Gould said the cooperation the command received from the State Department and the U.S. Embassy in Tbilisi was outstanding. This was a time when news outlets were saying the airport was closed and that Russian aircraft ruled the skies over Georgia. The last Georgian soldier based in Iraq reached Tbilisi Aug. 10.

The operation was barely completed when the command received another order: get ready to transport humanitarian relief supplies to Georgia. “I think we had about 36 to 48 hours to plan this,” Gould said.

The command was leaning forward and had begun planning efforts without receiving orders. “We got wind of the mission and began working closely with our contacts at U.S. European Command,” he said. “Again, it was on very short notice.”

Usually, the command can take months to plan “big muscle movements” like this, Gould said. TransCom officials worked closely with EuCom to decide what needed to be moved, when they wanted it, and how to get it there.

The command chose a C-17 Globemaster III to get the first two loads of humanitarian supplies to Tbilisi. Since then, two C-130 Hercules airlifters have flown to Tbilisi with supplies, and TransCom planners are in constant contact with their counterparts at EuCom and the Joint Staff to find out what type of sustainment lift is needed.

As the situation unfolds in Georgia, TransCom officials are looking at other ways to get humanitarian assistance to the country.

“We work with our customers across the globe, and depending on what needs to be moved and how quickly it needs to be there, we will find the right mode of transportation,” the general said. “Sealift is a possibility, and we are working with [the Navy’s] Military Sealift Command to examine the possibilities.”

The command is working with military and civilian agencies in the effort. Gould said the State Department has been actively involved on all fronts.

TransCom didn’t just drop everything else it was doing to concentrate on this crisis. The command has worldwide responsibilities that include keeping hundreds of thousands of U.S. servicemembers fighting two wars supplied.

“In this case, in a two-day effort, there was hardly any impact on sustainment operations or deployments in Iraq, Afghanistan or elsewhere,” Gould said. “Had it been a longer-term operation, over time there would be some degradation, but that would not happen to troops in contact.”

“To my mind, the real beauty of it was our young men and women who maintain and launch and load and fly these airplanes – that they were able to respond and make this move happen,” he said.

“The aircrews flying in [were] pretty brave guys,” Gould said, noting that at the time there were safety questions about landing in Tbilisi. “They took a chance because that’s what they were called to do, and they did a phenomenal job.

“It all boils down to we have a mission to do, and we do it,” the general continued. “Our motto out here is ‘A promise made is a promise kept.’ In this case, America made a promise to an ally, and we kept that promise."

Amen.

I have corresponded with folk in Georgia who tell a tale much different (surprise, surprise) than what the Russians and their breakaway provice allies are telling.

Those stories speak of Ossetians shelling a Gerogian village after the intital cease-fire...which the Georgians then correctly construed as a violation and attacked.

I believe this story for very simple and direct reasons.

1st, the Russians have great interests in maintaining control of the tunnel that exits the Caucasus mountains, and a sea approach into Georgia that is unopposed. They do so with the two seperatist, and they hope to be soon independent provinces. They have supported those movements for just these obvious reasons and not out of care for the people's there.

It is a geopolitical gambit to allow direct and immediate access into Georgia and the Caspian region and its resources.

2nd, the Russians were prepared far too quickly with their supposed "retalitory" actions. Putting together that much armor and troops, and the amphibious and naval operations that soon followed is not accomplished in a day or two. Those things had to be in motion for weeks beforehand.

Yet the Russians were ready to go within hours of the Georgians pushing north into South Ossetia. Clearly, the Russians had this planned well before the Georgians ever attacked.

I have no doubts at this point that the Russians helped and urged the Ossetians to attack, and goaded the Gerogians into coming north precisely so they could use it as a pretext for their military actions. Stories that try and view it as something different or being encouraged by the Russians and used as propoganda.

I also have no doubts because it all happened when it did, with the start of the Olympics. That was not just coincidence either.

People's who put their faith and trust in Putin and his ilk are misguided at best, and complicit with his aims at worst. He is not altruistic, and he is not "protecting" them. He is advancing his own plans for power and using naked aggression to do so.

Luckily, the Georgians held out long enough for the Presidents of Poland, Ukraine, Latvia, and Lithuania to arrive in Tiblisi before the Russians could get theere, and before they could kill the Georgian President which they were trying to do. That was one of the most couragous things I have seen done by a group of national leaders in my lifetime...and it worked.

Coupling that with Washington's strong response and Bush now sending the US military to spearhead humanitarian efforts for the Georgians...and at the same time provide a de facto military shield, has to this point halted the Russina military gambit.

The situation is still tense and a crisis for sure, but I believe now that Georgia will survive a free country.

If the populations of the two porvinces voite to go their own way, unfortunately I believe the UN will go along, as will the Russians of course, and Georgia will be deprived of those critical areas for its own defense.

The answer to this will likely be the US and Western Europe seriously upgrading and modernizing Georgia's military, her admission into NATO, and probably US or NATO bases in Georgia to ensure that she is not cut asunder by the Russian capability to at will come through that tunnel and land troops on the shore, all south of the Caucasus.

But make no mistake, the weaponry that the Georgians will utlimately receive in such a scenario, will allow them to do what they could not do this go around...that is target and bring down the tunnel, and target and oppose landing that would otherwise threaten them.

In addition to that, which will work against Putin's designs, there will also be other unintended consequences like the treaty Poland just signed, probably Ukraine's admittance into NATO as well as Ukraine severly restricting the Russian Black Sea fleet use of the base at Sevastapol, and other former satellites much more quickly and solidly being driven into the westen republics camp.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.